Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictionocracy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 03:30, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Fictionocracy

Non-notable neologism. --fvw * 17:18, 2005 Jan 5 (UTC)

Delete. Just being silly. Jeff Knaggs|Talk 17:25, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. We list Autocracy and Democracy, why not this? It should be stubbed and later expanded. --Anon user. 17:52, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Those are much-used and common terms, whereas this is a term someone on a bulletin board thought up. Also, please note anonymous users can't vote on Wikipedia, please register a username if you want to partake in votes. --fvw* 18:09, 2005 Jan 5 (UTC)
  - Although administrators are welcome to disregard sock puppet and anonymous votes as being in "bad faith", there is no absolute requirement that they do so--at least as I read the deletion policy. Votes with interesting or insightful commentary should be welcome additions to the debate regardless of whether they come from a logged in user or not. That said, the anonymous user is wrong in this case: Delete. --TenOfAllTrades 00:28, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    - Anons cannot vote on wikipedia, see the arbcom decision in the recent Lir arbitration. --fvw * 00:31, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)
Delete -- DCEdwards1966 20:33, Jan 5, 2005 (UTC)
Delete It's a made-up word. RoySmith 01:43, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete neologism. Gazpacho 03:30, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, deep thoughts (sort of) and besides, Orwell said it a lot better in 1984. Wyss 05:16, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.