Template talk:Shortcut
![]() | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, Template talk:Policy shortcut redirects here. |
![]() | Template:Shortcut is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
![]() | Text has been copied to or from this page; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
| |||
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
“Take up to ten (10) shortcuts as parameters” Don’t think so..?
[edit]Upon testing, it turns out that this template can take more than 10 shortcuts. I don’t know what the maximum number is. Did I misunderstand something, or should the documentation be edited as necessary? -Colathewikian (talk) 06:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I assume it's been outdated since it was turned into a module. Removed. Nardog (talk) 06:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- For the record, my tests showed around 9 quadrillion parameters, but that was using {{shortcut|9000000000000000=WP:FOO}}. It would probably break a lot sooner if you actually put that many shortcuts... CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 06:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 27 February 2022
[edit]![]() | This edit request to Module:Shortcut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please place the shortcut list div inside of the anchor list div, instead of after it. Currently, the browser (Firefox) scrolls not to the box, but about two line heights above it. In the case of MOS:DABBLUE, this makes it look like the shortcut points to the bullet item above the intended one. Paradoctor (talk) 23:43, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Note: Redirected target to module (Where the change would need to be made) Terasail[✉️] 16:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Not done it is not clear what you want to change. Please make your change in the sandbox here: Module:Shortcut/sandbox, test your change, then reactivate the immediate edit request. If you want to simply further discuss improvements to this module, feel free to continue below. — xaosflux Talk 19:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Edit request 11 September 2023
[edit]![]() | This edit request to Module:Shortcut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change:
I'd like to suggest creating an additional anchor for the input, without the prefix (before the colon character); i.e., "{{shortcut|MOS:SECTIONCOMMENT}}
" would create anchors for both "MOS:SECTIONCOMMENT" and "SECTIONCOMMENT". It'd cover a common use case, in which an anchor is manually defined before the shortcut:
{{Anchor|1=SECTIONCOMMENT}}
{{short|MOS:SECTIONCOMMENT}}
fgnievinski (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable. Could you make the required change to Module:Shortcut/sandbox? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Deactivating pending response to Martin's comment. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ha, I just came here looking for guidance on exactly this use case. Sounds like a good change to me. — Will • B [talk] 18:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Please add a width parameter
[edit]This could be useful on more than just help pages.
On a lot of help pages there is this:
{{Wikipedia how to|Example. Link2. Link3. Link4}} {{Wiki markup}}
Here is how it looks:
![]() | This help page is a how-to guide. It explains concepts or processes used by the Wikipedia community. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, and may reflect varying levels of consensus. |
But {{Wikipedia how to}} is broken, and does not wrap around the shortcut. So in portrait view in a cell phone the how-to text looks weird with a long column of text and a lot of wasted whitespace to the right and left of it. Like the following. I wrapped a narrow table around it so you could see the problem without having to go to your cell phone. Here is how it looks in my iphone SE 2020:
|
It has been like this for a long time, and has been asked about at WP:VPT, etc., but it is still broke. See:
- Template talk:Information page#Need to remove the image. So that the text is better visible in portrait view on cell phones
- Template talk:Wikipedia how-to#Remove the wrench to fix the template in portrait view in cell phones
- Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 204#Shortcuts box messes up cell phone view in narrow portrait orientation
- Template talk:Ombox#Text is not wrapping correctly in ombox on cell phones in portrait view
In the meantime there is an easy fix by putting the shortcut(s) below it. But it needs to be in a wider box. So that it takes up less vertical space in the right sidebar. I used a table below, not the shortcut template.
Like this:
|
--Timeshifter (talk) 22:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion on the Commons:
- c:Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Needs to be a better box for Current and Recent templates
- --Timeshifter (talk) 01:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)