Talk:Egyptian hieroglyphs
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Egyptian hieroglyphs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days ![]() |
![]() | Egyptian hieroglyphs received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vertical Stroke meaning disputed
[edit]"they are always accompanied by a mute vertical stroke indicating their status as a logogram" -- I agree this is the consensus interpretation of the Z1 vertical stroke(coptic - roht).
Nearly example I've ever seen follows a glyph with an "r". I consider this glyph to be an "r" determinative(still silent), but signifying that there is an "r" present. Whether this is after "per" or "re". It is also possible that a glyph has 2 different readings(ie 2 words for goose), where one of the words has an "r", and this signifies which word for the glyph to use. So I believe this logogram theory/interpretation is incorrect; both interpretations make the z1 heiroglyph silent, so it is mostly theoretical as to the why. 2601:58B:E7F:8410:30E3:3636:9B1C:7EB0 (talk) 19:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Obscure word example
[edit]O34-G38-G1-A47-D54 - keep, watch
This particular word does not exist in Faulkner, Vygus, Dickson, or AED(German) dictionaries, with a g38, but does exist with a g39 (wrong goose is shown). And the translation is wrong according to 3 dictionaries, and is based solely on the A47 glyph (guard determinitive).
There is no coptic equivalent of keep or watch starting with an s, or an s-s; the translation is suspect. The word has multiple determinatives(ignored glyphs), and is a bad teaching example.
O34-s [in ptolemys]
G39-Coptic smoune - goose, large duck (not gb/geb as in g38)
G1-Coptic Ahom - eagle, vulture
A47-Coptic eloiH? - shepherd (determinative?)(or guard determinitive?)
D54 - walk/move determinative or suffix?
"linger, await, creep" -- AED/Dickson/Vygus
'Ancestral to the alphabet'
[edit]'The later hieratic and demotic Egyptian scripts were derived from hieroglyphic writing, as was the Proto-Sinaitic script that later evolved into the Phoenician alphabet.'
This may or may not be technically true, but the phrasing is misleading, as it mixes apples and oranges. Hieratic and demotic are true continuations of the hieroglyphic logographic-consonantal system with the principles and structure virtually unchanged. The West Semitic abjad is fundamentally different in its principles and its (postulated) relation to the hieroglyphic script is highly indirect.
'Through the Phoenician alphabet's major child systems (the Greek and Aramaic scripts), the Egyptian hieroglyphic script is ancestral to the majority of scripts in modern use...'
Even the oft-repeated claim that the hieroglyphic script is 'ancestral' to the majority of modern scripts or, as the cited (non-linguistic) source says, that the Semites 'adopted about 30 hieroglyphs', has always been imprecise. A sign consists of the signifier and the signified - 'borrowing' the signifier without its signified (either in terms of sound or in terms of meaning) is not what you would normally mean by 'adopting' it. (This reminds me of the Cherokee 'adoption' of the Latin script.) The Semites neither borrowed the Egyptian phonetic values (saying, having the ox picture represent the sound sequence kʾ based on the Egyptian word for 'ox') nor used the 30 signs logographically as in Egyptian (say, having the ox picture denote the word *ʔalp- that has the meaning ox) - which are the the two ways Sumerian cuneiform signs and Chinese characters truly have been adopted by surrounding peoples. The only allegation is that they borrowed the specific shape of their signs, i.e. the specific way in which the pictograms depicted the concepts they relied on, and the general idea of exploiting the names of the concepts depicted for their sound values (and even then they did it very differently, using only the first consonant of the word that stood for the depicted concept, unlike the Egyptians, who generally let the sound value be determined by all the consonants that truly occurred in the word). The shapes were arguably the least important aspect of their innovation - they could have easily used other shapes. They are supposed to have basically reverse-engineered some of the basic principles of the origins of the Egyptian system (by then extremely far removed in time) and to have applied them to their own language in a drastically reduced and altered form - an extremely convoluted process which can hardly be called 'derivation', 'adoption' or, arguably, even a case of 'ancestry'; more like 'inspiration'. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 05:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Determinatives
[edit]Could determinatives be considered a type of pictograph? (Ancient Egyptian really doesn’t adhere to any modern category of writing which makes defining it so difficult!) Legendarycool (talk) 08:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- It entirely depends on what definition you use: if we understand pictograph in its broadest but most fraught sense of "a graph that visually resembles something", then sometimes. If we use a narrower but more well-defined sense as "a graph that evokes the physical appearance of its referent", then usually no, as determinatives were used for semantic classes of words, and were sometimes totally abstracted, like 𓈇—could you expect any human to tell you what that should represent if they didn't already know the convention? Remsense ‥ 论 08:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- So they’re not quite pictographs but they don’t always have phonetic values so maybe just calling them determinatives would work? It’s also kind of an issue because sometimes a character will represent a syllable, sometimes a logogram or just an idea. Legendarycool (talk) 09:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- They're usually specifically called "determinatives" for a good reason. Remsense ‥ 论 09:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- I’ll add that to the list.
- P.S thanks for responding quickly as usually it takes a day or two to get a response. Legendarycool (talk) 10:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Did some research, they’re called ideographs Legendarycool (talk) 10:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Like generally things with no phonetic component but meaning are called ideograms not that hieroglyphs that are like that aren’t determinatives. Legendarycool (talk) 10:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's a complicated term, it just means 'idea-writing'. That wouldn't be an accurate description of its actual function if it's being used as a phonetic determinative, since it's only representing a sound, not an idea. However, sometimes the use of determinatives is closer to 'idea-writing' than many other written symbols often called ideographs are, like Chinese characters, which never represent ideas directly, only words (hence often logographs 'word-writing')Remsense ‥ 论 10:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Like generally things with no phonetic component but meaning are called ideograms not that hieroglyphs that are like that aren’t determinatives. Legendarycool (talk) 10:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Did some research, they’re called ideographs Legendarycool (talk) 10:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- They're usually specifically called "determinatives" for a good reason. Remsense ‥ 论 09:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- So they’re not quite pictographs but they don’t always have phonetic values so maybe just calling them determinatives would work? It’s also kind of an issue because sometimes a character will represent a syllable, sometimes a logogram or just an idea. Legendarycool (talk) 09:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class Writing system articles
- High-importance Writing system articles
- B-Class Ancient Egypt articles
- Top-importance Ancient Egypt articles
- B-Class Egypt articles
- High-importance Egypt articles
- WikiProject Egypt articles
- B-Class Africa articles
- High-importance Africa articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- B-Class Archaeology articles
- High-importance Archaeology articles