Talk:Lookahead
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from VfD
[edit]From Vfd, which decided to keep after a rewrite:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/lookahead
This article is pretty useless. It begins with a comparison with other methods, rather than a definition of lookahead; in fact, there is no clear description of the concept anywhere in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.216.107.230 (talk) 04:17, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Split
[edit]Someone has re-instated the split tag without bothering to leave a comment on the talk page. I do not intend to spend my life trawling through the article history in the vain hope that an explanation has been given. If I understand the request correctly then it is without merit for the following reasons:
The content to be split off is unreferenced.
The content to be split off is not notable.
If I were to carry out the split as requested then the split article is liable to be deleted for the above reasons and my time would be wasted.
When I next do the monthly cleanup of split tags (on or after the 1st of the next month), I intend to remove the relevant material. Having removed the relevant material the reason for the split tag will disappear and hence I intend to remove the split tag.
If you do not wish me to do this then there are 4 options that I am aware of:
1) Do the split yourself (if you disagree with my reasons not to split)
2) Rectify the problems stated above (and then preferably carry out the split)
3) Put a comment on THIS talk page informing us of when you plan to rectify the problem and then rectify the problem in that time scale.
4) Put a comment on this talk page explaining what you really wanted.
Op47 (talk) 11:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Lookahead page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Lookahead" page.