Talk:Kaizen
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kaizen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
how many approaches?
[edit]The last sentence of the lead paragraph of § Overview is
- Two kaizen approaches have been distinguished.
Really? I count five: Point, System, Line, Plane, and Cube.
--Thnidu (talk) 20:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Line isn't actually defined here, though. Arided (talk) 11:10, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Related topics
[edit]Removed self-promoting, non-neutral prior content, truncating to just a list of related topics. LoneStarNot (talk) 00:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Kaizen page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Kaizen" page.
Categories:
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- C-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles