Jump to content

Talk:Pope John Paul II (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy Deletion?

[edit]

I'm not going to support the person who created the article with no real content at all, however, I also can't support the decision to mark for speedy deletion. As this is an actual movie, perhaps this page has some merit? Of course it would require a fair bit more content in order to stick around... IMDB Reference to this movie --Kyrin\talk 20:45, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)

Even in 2005 this topic was notable enough to merit inclusion. Sad that it took till now for work to be done, but just goes to show that not being done until now did not mean it never would be. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:12, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pope John Paul II (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]