Jump to content

Talk:Amy Tan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Criticism section

[edit]

Does anybody besides me think the "Criticism" section is heavy-handed? I note it was introduced by User:Ohio girl, who has since been banned for sock puppetry. Tan's books have been well received by critics in general. It appears to me User:Ohio girl had an ax to grind. I would like to remove this heavy-handed "Criticism" section. Any objections? Chisme (talk) 00:47, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. Heavy-handed that is. The whole paragraph sounds like a laundry list of accusations made by people who simply don't like Tan because she doesn't always portray Chinese culture or Chinese men in a flattering light. Sorry but they need to get over that. After all, if they don't like the way she writes they can always try writing their own books. Tell us how "it really is". Sweetness and light no doubt. LOL. Tan is the only American author I know of who has even attempted to write about the Chinese experience here in the States. Her work is seminal in that respect alone. The paragraph needs to be rewritten or taken out altogether. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.90.39 (talk) 08:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Chisme (talk · contribs) that this section is heavy-handed, unbalanced, and not encyclopedic in tone. I have changed it to "Critical Reception" and added content to reflect the reality, that reception to Tan's books is overwhelming positive from literary critics and the public alike. Edits thus far are: 1) Added content related to positive reviews, awards, and 2) summarized the 'critical' section, which feels far too heavy for an encyclopedic article. If you or anyone else can help fill out Amy's positive contributions to literature and society, please feel free to expand this work. She is a jewel of a human being and writer, and this article should reflect that. --Pmlydon (talk) 02:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]