Talk:Movement paradox
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Relative clause as noun equivalent
[edit]I know that a relative clause can function as the object of a preposition ("[that she wasted paper] displeased me"), but "we talked about [that he was sick] for days" doesn't sound any more or less natural than "[that he was sick] we talked about for days." Both of them sound fishy and unnatural. Is there a more natural example that could go there instead?
Aren't I
[edit]I have removed the following:
A more striking example of a movement paradox can be found in English morphology:
- *I aren't allowed to do that
- Aren't I allowed to do that?
In a transformational analysis, the question is formed by the movement of aren't to the front of the sentence, which does not explain why aren't is acceptable (in some dialects) as a contraction of am not only after movement. The problem may be alleviated if one assumes that morphological processes apply after movement, but this raises a further problem:
- *Am not I allowed to do that?
If morphological processes applied after movement then the sentence above would presumably be the one from which "Aren't I allowed to do that" would derive, but it is clearly ungrammatical.
Since "aren't/amn't/ain't I" is a sui generis anomaly, I don't see the value of using it to illustrate a general point. jnestorius(talk) 20:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see it that way. I think "aren't I" is anomalous precisely because "I aren't" isn't possible in standard English. Why do you think it's an anomaly of its own kind? -- UKoch (talk) 00:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- I tend to view this as a irregularity in the use of the particular verb. It is encapsulated and recognised explicitly in: I am, aren't I? 78.33.185.122 (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Movement paradox page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Movement paradox" page.