Talk:Sponsorship scandal
Appearance
The contents of the Jean Lafleur page were merged into Sponsorship scandal on 21 February 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Jean Lafleur was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 12 September 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Sponsorship scandal. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sponsorship scandal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 years |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adscam
[edit]From the current press coverage, Adscam sems to be the current name for this. Should the article be moved? Jamesday 05:36, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- All Canadian media coverage uses 'sponsorship scandal' as the standard name. 'Adscam' is a short-form, used more for brevity and by the tabloid-level media, in my experience. A redirect can't hurt, though. Radagast 15:30, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
- At least till it becomes a disambig :"D - RoyBoy 800 03:19, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- The result of Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Adscam blog disclosure was to merge that article with this one. I don't know enough about this to do it well myself. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:50, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- At least till it becomes a disambig :"D - RoyBoy 800 03:19, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Some Content Sources
[edit]http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1076696402720_72105602?s_name=&no_ads= http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1109631011275&call_pageid=1076411360530&col=1076411360550
MARTIN’S MORAL LEADERSHIP
[edit]Moved political commentary to User:Westviking page. Dabbler 16:57, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- High-importance Canada-related articles
- C-Class Governments of Canada articles
- High-importance Governments of Canada articles
- C-Class Canadian law articles
- High-importance Canadian law articles
- C-Class History of Canada articles
- High-importance History of Canada articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles