Jump to content

Talk:Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Better merge with this with Velankanni article

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


There is no development of this article as the article Velankanni is getting lot of inputs and has lot of required information. It is time to merge this article with Velankanni article as both are to speak the same contents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrownyCat (talkcontribs) 00:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no Disagree I strongly appose this move. This is about an important church building and is rated as Rated B-class, Mid-importance by WikiProject Christianity in India. This church is one of the most famous in India and the most famous catholic church in south India. This article should stay. The reason that there is no improvement is not a valid one. Let it stay as a stub, if it has to. But please do not merge it with an article about a governmental jurisdiction. --Jayarathina (talk) 13:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@BrownyCat: I also feel the same but in the opposite way.

@Jayarathina: Why not merge Our Lady of Good Health into this B class article to avoid WP:duplicate content? Both have pretty much the same content. We can move whatever little extra matter sections and pictures were found, from the Lady of Good Health article to here. Yochikapika (talk) 15:52, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Existing content is quite good. Article could stand for some content regarding the structure of the building, such as construction materials, design, layout of the building, etc, as such content tends to be required on any articles relative to buildings. John Carter 14:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Nice work! John Carter 14:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]