Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:VIP)
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. |
---|
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important!
|
This page was last updated at 16:52 on 24 October 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by HBC AIV helperbot14 (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
Reports
[edit]- Extra Arya Shah (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1067 (LTA 1067, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- MrOllieHater (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Ssch.cb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning. Persistent changing of Infobox image to copyrighted material. And clearly WP:NOTHERE, see discussion. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also reported at Commons:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Ssch.cb for their behaviour of uploading copyrighted material at Commons. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:53, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- And also persistently harassing and spamming my talk page. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll They're clearly trying to change an image in good faith. You would get further by explaining our copyright rules. Blocking would be a gross overreaction. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @HJ Mitchell I had already directed them to our policies on copyright violation which I believe is more than sufficient and would have explained better than I could however they clearly has no intention to read it but were expecting some other answer on what is seemingly asking for my personal opinions so ... I think it may be worthwhile to block them temporarily since they're clearly disregarding policies and obviously proclaiming to not going to read it hence I'm not sure what's their deal here, doing things by their own rules? — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- So ... you thought you'd report them for vandalism? Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @HJ Mitchell I had already directed them to our policies on copyright violation which I believe is more than sufficient and would have explained better than I could however they clearly has no intention to read it but were expecting some other answer on what is seemingly asking for my personal opinions so ... I think it may be worthwhile to block them temporarily since they're clearly disregarding policies and obviously proclaiming to not going to read it hence I'm not sure what's their deal here, doing things by their own rules? — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll They're clearly trying to change an image in good faith. You would get further by explaining our copyright rules. Blocking would be a gross overreaction. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- And also persistently harassing and spamming my talk page. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also reported at Commons:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Ssch.cb for their behaviour of uploading copyrighted material at Commons. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:53, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:408C:831A:2FDB:C484:F70A:EA01:5F87 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Nxcrypto Message 15:06, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. They're providing sources. You'll have to go to ANI if the edits are still disruptive. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Blthippeswamy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Persistent vandalism after being warned several times. Not here to build an encyclopedia.— Anita5192 (talk) 15:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)