Jump to content

Talk:Yazid I

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleYazid I is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 26, 2021.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 24, 2019Good article nomineeListed
March 28, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 11, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

Semi-protected edit request on 18 September 2023

[edit]

It is more historically accurate to have the fact that Husayn was murdered than that he just died 82.197.209.4 (talk) 23:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Lightoil (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The cause of death was not considered old age or accidental—correct? The line ended as Muhammad and the Koran foretold the son of Yahweh has come can and does answer prayers to Yahweh Christ Jew doesn’t guarantee the result or answer you want but the Jew God is One we are Jews Muhammad married a Christian Wife he was a Jew, his wife a Jew, we are Jews male & female splitting blessings and dividing the Devines intent to Creat Love & Be loved, Amen. 64.235.83.227 (talk) 06:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

H. Lammens's source is very outdated

[edit]

I had a friend who told me the sources by H. Lammens are outdated. Specifically on the Islamic Jurisprudences opinion on cursing Yazid; like saying Hanbalis oppose cursing him, even though the founder himself cursed him in a fatwa he wrote, calling out his war crimes, and even popular Shafi jurists curse Yazid too. 39.60.214.46 (talk) 11:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 August 2024

[edit]

I need to edit it as this artical about yazid (lanta-tul-allay) is extremely inaccurate like it says he was a 'caliph' he wsant as caliph is a muslim leader and he was the opposite Muhammad Haseeb Ahmed (talk) 19:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. JTP (talkcontribs) 20:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 August 2024

[edit]

dont call him caliph call him an amir and not an ummayad caliphate do dynasty nan it wasnt the first but second time ruler ship was inhereted as ali(r.a.) gave caliphate to his son Hassan (r.a.) change his relgion from islam to N/A and say remove trhe part that says that only some sunnis dislike yazid to all a he qwas the real servent of shaitan and say that sunnis have no diffrent opons to shias about yazid Muhammad Haseeb Ahmed (talk) 20:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. CloakedFerret (talk) 02:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]