Jump to content

Talk:Murder of Brooke Hart and the lynching of Thomas Harold Thurmond and John M. Holmes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

copyedit needed

[edit]

Thurmond is arrested twice and Hart's body is found twice -- this reads like two separate articles interleaved into one. I could take a stab at fixing this, but I'm not as familiar with the subject matter as others might be.--NapoliRoma (talk) 00:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any information about where Brooke Hart's earlier life? Was the family home in San Jose? There's a street address given, but there's not a city attached to that address. The family information looks like it was an afterthought with poor punctuation - almost like an unformatted chart. Jtyroler (talk) 20:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jackie Coogan

[edit]

findadeath.com reports that Hart was a frat brother (Santa Clara University) and good friend of the actor Jackie Coogan. CFLeon (talk) 19:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NY Daily News Photos

[edit]

There are some striking photos in a NY Daily News article on this:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2010/09/12/2010-09-12_they_had_it_coming_gov_glad_mob_lynched_killers.html

I don't have the computer know-how to upload them. -- Michael David (talk) 18:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Computer know-how is not the problem. The photograph is owned by San Jose Mercury News. It is recommend to get permission from them before adding it to Wikipedia. The age of the photograph may mean it is fine to copy but there could still be some copyright issues. --Traveler100 (talk) 05:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So Much Duplication

[edit]

The crowd gathered three different times and psychiatrists visited twice. This really needs some help. If I come back and nothing has been changed, I'll give it a go. Ngmcs8203 (talk) 06:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brooke Hart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Lynching was never legal. So why would there be "subsequent Congressional attempts to outlaw lynching"?Royalcourtier (talk) 06:02, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Royalcourtier: I believe the point is that lynching is not a specific crime. There are crimes committed during the lynching (rioting, assault, murder) that could be tried as separate crimes, but there is no "crime of lynching," if that makes sense. There may have been subsequent efforts to define the crime of "lynching" but there probably were sufficient other crimes committed during the course of the lynching that could have been prosecuted. Refer to this article, published contemporaneously with the 1933 lynching:
"California Has No Anti-lynching Law". Madera Tribune. UP. 27 November 1933. Retrieved 29 November 2016.
Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brooke Hart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]