Jump to content

Talk:Claude of France

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.164.244.87 (talk) 05:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] 

Untitled

[edit]

proposed that Queen Claude of France be moved to Claude of France. per Wiki naming convention of former royal consorts Mowens35 19:38, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • oppose. the naming convention is highly debated as well, and until that´s properly settled, voting to keep this. what on earth is Claude of France supposed to be? looking at the heading of such an article, was she princess, duchess, maid...? or propose Claude, Queen of France Antares911 13:58, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. The naming convention regarding this question is clear and accepted, and only some lone (loony?) debater attempted to change it some two months ago, being practically shouted down by more experienced editors. Queen consorts do NOT have the "queenly" title in their headings, and so this one will also not have it. Arrigo 08:37, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

why tags were added

[edit]

this article needs to be clean up and put toghter better and needs sections to make it easyer to readOo7565 05:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did she speak Breton?

[edit]

Did she speak Breton? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahassan05 (talkcontribs) 07:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Anne of Brittany which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Claude's Down Syndrome

[edit]

I propose that we remove the section mentioning the possibility of her having Down Syndrome, since: A) There are no English sources regarding her having this condition, which is curious considering she was married to Francis I, long-time rival of Henry VIII, King of England. B) The sources used in the section were published in 2007 and 2010, but were only added to the wikipedia in 2024 (the year in which I'm writing this) which, though not a sign of falsehood does make one question. C) The supposed 'proof' of her having Down Syndrome is that she was good-natured and described as ugly. D) She is certainly not known to be a queen who likely had Down Syndrome, as a quote in the page says so outright. Instead, she is known as the daughter of Anne of Brittany, King Louis XII and the first wife of King Francis I of France. E) Beyond the sources, no other publications about Claude's life or that of her parents mentions that possibility. Bialessasoares (talk) 04:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A) That does not matter. Wikipedia accepts references in other languages as long as they are good references.
B) That does not matter. Information are included in articles by individual decisions. It is entirely up to an individual who hapen to notice a source, decide to edit the article, and decide to put information from the source in the article. There is no reason at all to question why information from an source published in 2007 are put in the article in 2024.
C) Well, if it is a theory from a good source, then it may be included in an article even if it is merely a theory.
D) Such a thing would not in itself be strange at all, since that diagnosis was not historically identified.
E) The sources are enough to include it. --Aciram (talk) 11:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]