Talk:Terrorism
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Terrorism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think we should add 'new terrorism' under the broad heading of terrorism. It is widely accepted within scholarly and policy circles we are in the midst of confronting something fundamentally different to the terrorisms of old. Add link to Terrorism and internet article Blade8603 (talk) 13:34, 13 December 2009 (UTC) The linking of civil disorder and terrorism is tenuous at the least. |
Causes section
[edit]"Ending perceived government oppression" can be changed to "Ending perceived government oppression (for example Suffragette bombing and arson campaign[1].
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:d591:5f10:316e:b09b:a12a:56ad (talk • contribs) 17:58, 17 July 2021 (UCT)
Combining "Historical background" and "History" section
[edit]To me, this is a no-brainer, but given the scope of the edit I thought it best to just gauge opinions. It seems the "Historical background" and "History" sections cover essentially the same information, so I propose we incorporate all the information in the "History" section into the "Historical background" section, retaining the latter subheading. Yr Enw (talk) 06:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment (Summoned by bot) why is this an RfC? It doesn't seem from the question that there's been in any previous contention regarding this? If not then this is a waste of resources making an RfC about it. Just be bold and do it and come back if and when there is disagreement, or better yet just have a normal discussion first. TarnishedPathtalk 08:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. My hesitation was given how large a change it is to the structure of the article, but will follow your advice. Yr Enw (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Yr Enw I'd suggest removing the RfC template. If there's a revert have a discussion to see if you can come to consensus before thinking about an RfC again. TarnishedPathtalk 08:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. My hesitation was given how large a change it is to the structure of the article, but will follow your advice. Yr Enw (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
"Historical Background" section example request
[edit]Someone requested an example for the line:
"Most scholars[example needed] today trace the origins of the modern tactic of terrorism to the Jewish Sicarii Zealots who attacked Romans and Jews in 1st-century Palestine."
I can find mentions of this in the book "The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al Qaeda" by G Chaliand, A Blin. This particular source seems to have a lot of credibility, and has also been widely cited, but I'm not sure about "most scholars". However, if only a particular example was required, then perhaps we should add a citation?
IsfahanKaAasmaan (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- I thought it was already cited. Ben Azura (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
"Famous terrorists" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Famous terrorists has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 22 § Famous terrorists until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
"Demographics of terrorism" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Demographics of terrorism has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 22 § Demographics of terrorism until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Hamas is anti-Zionistic, not anti Semitic.
[edit]under religious terrorism, the paragraph about Hamas says they are anti Semitic. however, they are anti-Zionistic. They are not the same thing. Bobkhan1234 (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Arabs are are sometimes described as semitic. Is it that Hamas are opposed to the state of Israel, rather than hating the jewish people as a racial group? Isn't there a need for clarification here. Especially as Wikipedis defines "semitic" as an obsolete ethnic term. Does Hamas have any views on descendants of Jews for whom Palestine was their homeland? Rwood128 (talk) 12:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
No mention of Algeria?
[edit]The Algerian revolution was one of the first cases of the use of the term terrorism to justify the actions taken by the French military, to directly quote the article on the Algerian war "the mission of the French Army was "ensuring security", "maintaining order" and "pacification" (...) The FLN were referred to as "criminals", "bandits", "outlaws", "terrorists" and "fellagha"." The mention in this article as terrorism only being widely used after the 70s is highly misleading for this reason. I feel like this merits at least more than a passing mention. Hexifi (talk) 02:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- High-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Terrorism articles
- Top-importance Terrorism articles
- WikiProject Terrorism articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- High-importance Crime-related articles
- C-Class Serial killer-related articles
- Mid-importance Serial killer-related articles
- Serial Killer task force
- C-Class Organized crime articles
- Low-importance Organized crime articles
- Organized crime task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- C-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of High-importance
- C-Class United States Government articles
- High-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- United States Government articles with to-do lists
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists